State v. Mullen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mullen

356 S.W.3d 835, 2012 WL 43015, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 13

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 10, 2012

DocketWD 72675

StatusPublished

This text of 356 S.W.3d 835 (State v. Mullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mullen, 356 S.W.3d 835, 2012 WL 43015, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 13 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Mullen appeals from his conviction on one count of felony stealing, § 570.030. After a thorough review of the record, we find that Mullen’s conviction is supported by sufficient evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Mullen appeals from his conviction on one count of felony stealing, § 570.030. After a thorough review of the record, we find that Mullen’s conviction is supported by sufficient evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 S.W.3d 835, 2012 WL 43015, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mullen-moctapp-2012.