State v. Muhammad

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Muhammad

577 S.W.3d 880

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 2, 2019

DocketWD 80938

StatusPublished

This text of 577 S.W.3d 880 (State v. Muhammad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Muhammad, 577 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*881Appellant Omar Muhammad was found guilty of murder in the second degree, armed criminal action, and receiving stolen property, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Muhammad appeals, claiming that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing two hearsay statements into evidence and erred when it denied his oral motion to sever the charges of second degree murder and armed criminal action from charges for burglary and possession of stolen goods. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*881Appellant Omar Muhammad was found guilty of murder in the second degree, armed criminal action, and receiving stolen property, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Muhammad appeals, claiming that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing two hearsay statements into evidence and erred when it denied his oral motion to sever the charges of second degree murder and armed criminal action from charges for burglary and possession of stolen goods. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 S.W.3d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-muhammad-moctapp-2019.