State v. Muhammad
352 S.W.3d 419, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 2011 WL 5374109
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Muhammad. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 256 →
Opinion
ORDER
Jamaal Muhammad appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no error. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Muhammad, 352 S.W.3d 419, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 2011 WL 5374109 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
352 S.W.3d 419 (State v. Muhammad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SAGITTO v. McDonald
352 S.W.3d 419 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)