State v. M.S.P.

647 So. 2d 847, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 32, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 15, 1995 WL 8969
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 12, 1995·No. No. 84149·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in M.S.P. v. State, 640 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), which certified conflict with the opinion in B.H. v. State, 622 So.2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla.Const. The decision below is quashed and the case remanded for reconsideration in light of our opinion in B.H. v. State, 645 So.2d 987 (Fla.1994).

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., OVERTON and WELLS, JJ., and MeDONALD, Senior Justice, concur. HARDING, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion. KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion, in which SHAW, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. M.S.P., 647 So. 2d 847, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 32, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 15, 1995 WL 8969 (Fla. 1995).

647 So. 2d 847 (State v. M.S.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

B.H. v. State
622 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
M.S.P. v. State
640 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
B.H. v. State
645 So. 2d 987 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)