State v. Mrozak
497 S.W.3d 818, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 658, 2016 WL 3538557
Opinion
ORDER
David Mrozak appeals his conviction following a jury trial for attempted entiee[819] ment of a child and sentence of ten years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove lack of entrapment beyond a reasonable doubt. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mrozak, 497 S.W.3d 818, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 658, 2016 WL 3538557 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
497 S.W.3d 818 (State v. Mrozak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.