State v. Mounts

150 S.E. 513, 108 W. Va. 53, 1929 W. Va. LEXIS 177
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 22, 1929
Docket6449
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 150 S.E. 513 (State v. Mounts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mounts, 150 S.E. 513, 108 W. Va. 53, 1929 W. Va. LEXIS 177 (W. Va. 1929).

Opinion

*54 Hatcher, Judge:

This is a proceeding by a school commissioner.

Moses Mounts died in 19'04 owning a tract of 225 acres in Logan county. His heirs instituted a partiton suit, in which this tract was partitioned in 1905. One of the exterior boundaries of the tract was the Trace Fork of Island Creek. The portion bordering on- the stream was divided into seven lots, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9. (See copy of partition map.) This litigation grows out of the fact that the courses and the distances in the descriptions of the lots do not coincide with the meanders of the creek, and do not extend entirely to the bank of the creek. It is the contention of the state that the lot lines should be run according to course and distance; that when so done there is a strip of land between the lots and the creek; and that this strip has been off the land books since 1905, and is forfeited to the state for the non-payment of taxes. The heirs of Mounts concur in the contention of the state and ask the right to redeem the strip. Lot No. 9 is the only one involved on this appeal. It was allotted to Brookie Martin, a daughter of Mounts, who conveyed it to Mrs. H. C. Jones in 1906. She and her estate have owned and paid the taxes on it since that time. The lot is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the railroad right of way with same N. 77%° W. 379 feet to corner of lot No. 6, and with same S. 14° E. 186 feet to a stake on the bank of the Trace Fork of Island Creek; N. 82° 50' E. 215 feet; N. 51° E. 199 feet to the beginning, containing 34,848 square feet. The executor of the Jones estate takes the position that there is no vacant land between lot 9 and the creek.

As Island Creek is a non-navigable stream, a call for the bank would ordinarily extend ad filum aquae. Carter v. Ry. Co., 26 W. Va. 644. In recognition of this rule the circuit court fixed the corner of the line between lots 6 and 9 at the thread of the stream, and decreed that the exterior lines of lot 9 should follow the stream 215 feet and from thence go N. 24° 57' E. 203.5 feet to the beginning. The beginning corner (the point on the right of way 279 feet from the corner of lot 6) is “about 120 feet” from the center of the creek. Consequently, the decree leaves between the closing line of *55 lot 9 and the creek, a quadrangular strip which the court held was excluded from the partition and is forfeited to the state.

*0

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pocahontas Land Corp. v. Evans
332 S.E.2d 604 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1985)
Clonch v. Tabit
12 S.E.2d 521 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1940)
Conner v. Jarrett
200 S.E. 39 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 S.E. 513, 108 W. Va. 53, 1929 W. Va. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mounts-wva-1929.