State v. Mostafa

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mostafa

570 S.W.3d 634

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 2019

DocketWD 81054

StatusPublished

This text of 570 S.W.3d 634 (State v. Mostafa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mostafa, 570 S.W.3d 634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mohamed Mostafa appeals his conviction in the Boone County Circuit Court for rape and sentence of twenty-five years' imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he claims the trial court erred in admitting DNA test results into evidence. Mostafa asserts that DNA results were fruit of the poisonous tree. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mohamed Mostafa appeals his conviction in the Boone County Circuit Court for rape and sentence of twenty-five years' imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he claims the trial court erred in admitting DNA test results into evidence. Mostafa asserts that DNA results were fruit of the poisonous tree. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 S.W.3d 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mostafa-moctapp-2019.