State v. Mossey

2013 ND 194
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 23, 2013
Docket20130138
StatusPublished

This text of 2013 ND 194 (State v. Mossey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mossey, 2013 ND 194 (N.D. 2013).

Opinion

Filed 10/23/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2013 ND 194

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Lance Mossey, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20130138

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Christene A. Reierson, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for plaintiff and appellee.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 1st Street Northwest, Mandan, N.D. 58554-3118, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Mossey

[¶1] Lance Mossey appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of class B felony luring a minor by computer in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-05.1.  Mossey argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, he was improperly tried in Ward County because his acts on the computer occurred in Cass County, and the prosecutor’s statement about police protecting children made during closing argument was so prejudicial he should be granted a new trial.  We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).   See State v. Backlund , 2003 ND 184, ¶¶ 1, 2, 11, 672 N.W.2d 431 (North Dakota had jurisdiction to prosecute defendant for luring a minor by computer where the defendant sent messages from his computer in Moorhead, Minnesota to a police officer posing as a 14-year-old girl in West Fargo, North Dakota); N.D.C.C. § 29-03-

09(3) (venue of action for luring a minor by computer may be in any county in which the offense was committed, or in which an act was done by the accused in facilitating the commission of the offense); State v. Gibbs , 2009 ND 44, ¶ 21, 763 N.W.2d 430 (jury is presumed to follow curative instructions).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann, S.J.

[¶3] The Honorable William A. Neumann, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Backlund
2003 ND 184 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2003)
State v. Gibbs
2009 ND 44 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2013 ND 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mossey-nd-2013.