State v. Moss

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Moss

125 S.W.3d 861, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1851, 2003 WL 22793420

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2003·No. No. ED 82717·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Moss appeals from the trial court’s judgment upon his conviction of second-degree robbery of a K-Mart store. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by sufficient evidence. State v. McCoy, 90 S.W.3d 503, 505 (Mo.App.E.D.2002). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Moss appeals from the trial court’s judgment upon his conviction of second-degree robbery of a K-Mart store. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by sufficient evidence. State v. McCoy, 90 S.W.3d 503, 505 (Mo.App.E.D.2002). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Moss, 125 S.W.3d 861, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1851, 2003 WL 22793420 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

125 S.W.3d 861 (State v. Moss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related