State v. Mosley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mosley

709 S.W.2d 122, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3973

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Mosley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3660 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 1986·No. No. 49455·Published

Opinion

[123]*123ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a jury conviction of burglary in the first degree, Sec. 569.160 RSMo.1978. Appellant claims there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction and contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[123]*123ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a jury conviction of burglary in the first degree, Sec. 569.160 RSMo.1978. Appellant claims there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction and contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Mosley, 709 S.W.2d 122, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3973 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

709 S.W.2d 122 (State v. Mosley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.