State v. Moses

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Moses

196 S.E.2d 211, 283 N.C. 390, 1973 N.C. LEXIS 974

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 9, 1973

DocketNo. 73

StatusPublished

This text of 196 S.E.2d 211 (State v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moses, 196 S.E.2d 211, 283 N.C. 390, 1973 N.C. LEXIS 974 (N.C. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s sworn statements fully support the court’s adjudication that defendant’s plea of guilty was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made. Indeed, defendant’s answers include his sworn statement that he was in fact guilty of the criminal offense charged in the warrant.

On appeal, defendant contends that a new trial should be granted on the ground the warrant fails to charge a criminal offense. Obviously, there is no merit in this contention.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s sworn statements fully support the court’s adjudication that defendant’s plea of guilty was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made. Indeed, defendant’s answers include his sworn statement that he was in fact guilty of the criminal offense charged in the warrant.

On appeal, defendant contends that a new trial should be granted on the ground the warrant fails to charge a criminal offense. Obviously, there is no merit in this contention.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 S.E.2d 211, 283 N.C. 390, 1973 N.C. LEXIS 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moses-nc-1973.