State v. Mortland

829 S.W.2d 131, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 956, 1992 WL 109461
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 26, 1992·No. No. 60289·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from her conviction by the court for harassment in violation of § 565.090.1(3) RSMo 1986. She was sentenced to 30 days imprisonment, execution of sentence was suspended and she was placed on two years probation. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mortland, 829 S.W.2d 131, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 956, 1992 WL 109461 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

829 S.W.2d 131 (State v. Mortland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.