State v. Mortimore

764 P.2d 960
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 23, 1988·No. B71-526 CA A47988·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

764 P.2d 960 (1988)
94 Or.App. 179

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
William Matthew MORTIMORE, Appellant.

B71-526; CA A47988.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted August 24, 1988.
Decided November 23, 1988.

Charles M. Gudger, III, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and GRABER, J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J. Pro Tem.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant raises objections to conditions of probation imposed by the trial court. Assuming that those conditions are reviewable, in the trial court, we will not consider them for the first time on appeal. State v. Kidd, 61 Or. App. 292, 656 P.2d 391 (1983).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mortimore, 764 P.2d 960 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

764 P.2d 960 (State v. Mortimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hagger
810 P.2d 1356 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Gilbertson
789 P.2d 19 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)