State v. Mortensen

280 P.3d 1063, 250 Or. App. 560, 2012 WL 2344182, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 778
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 20, 2012
Docket201022520; A147746
StatusPublished

This text of 280 P.3d 1063 (State v. Mortensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mortensen, 280 P.3d 1063, 250 Or. App. 560, 2012 WL 2344182, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 778 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged with attempted first-degree burglary, found guilty except for insanity, and placed .under the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in accepting her waiver of her right to trial by jury when, among other circumstances, defendant exhibited confusion at trial about her surroundings and was not tracking the court’s waiver discussion. A discussion of the pertinent facts would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the court should have ordered a competency evaluation under ORS 161.360 and erred in accepting the jury waiver. We agree and accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 161.360
Oregon § 161.360

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 P.3d 1063, 250 Or. App. 560, 2012 WL 2344182, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mortensen-orctapp-2012.