State v. Morse

South Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Morse

223 N.W. 600, 54 S.D. 481, 1929 S.D. LEXIS 351

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 21, 1929

DocketFile No. 6657

StatusPublished

This text of 223 N.W. 600 (State v. Morse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Morse, 223 N.W. 600, 54 S.D. 481, 1929 S.D. LEXIS 351 (S.D. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendants were informed against and convicted of the crime of robbery, the defense being in the nature of an alibi. From the judgment and an order denying their motion for a new trial, they have appealed.

[482]*482The sole question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence, which was conflicting. The testimony introduced by the state, if believed by the jury, furnishes ample support for the verdict.

The judgment and order appeal from are therefore affirmed.

M'ISER, C., sitting in lieu of BROWN, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendants were informed against and convicted of the crime of robbery, the defense being in the nature of an alibi. From the judgment and an order denying their motion for a new trial, they have appealed.

[482]*482The sole question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence, which was conflicting. The testimony introduced by the state, if believed by the jury, furnishes ample support for the verdict.

The judgment and order appeal from are therefore affirmed.

M'ISER, C., sitting in lieu of BROWN, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 N.W. 600, 54 S.D. 481, 1929 S.D. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morse-sd-1929.