State v. Morse
527 S.W.3d 167, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 864, 2017 WL 3707111
This text of 527 S.W.3d 167 (State v. Morse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Morse, 527 S.W.3d 167, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 864, 2017 WL 3707111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
Order
Brandon Morse appeals from his conviction for first-degree tampering. Morse contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove that he knowingly operated a vehicle without the consent of the vehicle’s owner. For reasons explained herein, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction,
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brandon Scott Morse v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
527 S.W.3d 167, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 864, 2017 WL 3707111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morse-moctapp-2017.