State v. Morse
This text of 413 S.W.3d 387 (State v. Morse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Harold Morse appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of one count of concealing a prohibited article in a correctional facility. We find the trial court did not err in admitting testimony about the statement Morse made claiming ownership of the weapon found in his cell. Additionally, we find the trial court did not err in conducting voir dire. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. [388]*388The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
413 S.W.3d 387, 2013 WL 5988938, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morse-moctapp-2013.