State v. Morrow
700 S.E.2d 224
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Morrow. Read the opinion of the Court — 364 N.C. 424 →
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Joseph Dwayne MORROW.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
Mark Montgomery, Durham, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C. ___, 700 S.E.2d 1 (2010), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Chief Justice PARKER and Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and HUDSON dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C. ___, 700 S.E.2d 1 (2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Morrow, 700 S.E.2d 224 (N.C. 2010).
700 S.E.2d 224 (State v. Morrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bowditch
700 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)