State v. Morrow

334 S.W.3d 925, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 419, 2011 WL 1118505
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 2011·No. WD 70307·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*926 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Wayland Morrow appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action after a jury trial. Wayland Morrow claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on both counts because the State’s evidence was insufficient to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Wayland Morrow acted in concert with Robert Morrow to cause the death of Sheldon Haynes; and (2) the trial court erred and abused its discretion in denying Wayland Morrow’s objection to inadmissible hearsay statements made by Robert Morrow and to the State’s comments on the same in closing argument. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Morrow, 334 S.W.3d 925, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 419, 2011 WL 1118505 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

334 S.W.3d 925 (State v. Morrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrow v. State
446 S.W.3d 731 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Toombs
334 S.W.3d 925 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)