State v. Morrison

2022 Ohio 104
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 18, 2022
Docket2021-A-0039, 2021-A-0040, 2021-A-0041, 2021-A-0043
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 Ohio 104 (State v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Morrison, 2022 Ohio 104 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Morrison, 2022-Ohio-104.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NOS. 2021-A-0039 2021-A-0040 Plaintiff-Appellee, 2021-A-0041 2021-A-0043 -v- Criminal Appeals from the HENRY C. MORRISON, Court of Common Pleas

Defendant-Appellant. Trial Court Nos. 2021 CR 00405 2021 CR 00349 2021 CR 00096 2021 CR 00078

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Decided: January 18, 2022 Judgment: Appeals dismissed

Colleen Mary O’Toole, Ashtabula County Prosecutor, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH 44047 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Henry C. Morrison, pro se, PID# A783322, North Central Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1812, Marion, OH 43302 (Defendant-Appellant).

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.

{¶1} On December 9, 2021, appellant, Henry C. Morrison, pro se, filed a notice

of appeal in Ashtabula C.P. No. 2021 CR 00405 (11th Dist. No. 2021-A-0039) and 2021

CR 00349 (11th Dist. No. 2021-A-0040) from the trial court’s October 12, 2021 sentencing

entry. {¶2} On the same date, appellant filed a notice of appeal in 2021 CR 00096 (11th

Dist. No. 2021-A-0041) and 2021 CR 00078 (11th Dist. No. 2021-A-0043) from the trial

court’s September 17, 2021 sentencing entry.

{¶3} The appeals were consolidated by this court on December 23, 2021.

{¶4} A timely notice of appeal was due in 2021-A-0039 and 2021-A-0040 no later

than November 12, 2021, which was not a holiday or weekend. Thus, the appeals are

untimely filed by 27 days.

{¶5} A timely notice of appeal was due in 2021-A-0041 and 2021-A-0043 by

October 18, 2021, which was not a holiday or weekend. Thus, the appeals are untimely

filed by approximately one and one-half months.

{¶6} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry

shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” App.R.

4(A)(1).

{¶7} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶8} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * *

{¶9} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and

shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right *

* *.” App.R. 5(A).

{¶10} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R.

4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without

Case Nos. 2021-A-0039, 2021-A-0040, 2021-A-0041, 2021-A-0043 jurisdiction to consider his appeals. Appellant has a remedy of filing an untimely criminal

appeal under App.R. 5(A).

{¶11} Appeals dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.,

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

concur.

Case Nos. 2021-A-0039, 2021-A-0040, 2021-A-0041, 2021-A-0043

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 Ohio 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morrison-ohioctapp-2022.