State v. Morris
This text of State v. Morris (State v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Stacey Lee Morris, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-270
Submitted April 1, 2005 Filed April 8, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant, Stacey Lee Morris, pled guilty to assault and battery with intent to kill. The trial judge sentenced Morris to ten years. Morris counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Morris did not file a separate pro se brief. We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991). Counsels petition to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Morris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morris-scctapp-2005.