State v. Morris

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Morris

944 N.E.2d 697, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1448

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 6, 2011

Docket2010-1842

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 944 N.E.2d 697 (State v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Morris, 944 N.E.2d 697, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1448 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Medina App. No. 09CA0022-M, 2010-Ohio-4282. Reported at 127 Ohio St.3d 1533, 2011-Ohio-376, 940 N.E.2d 986. On motion for reconsideration. The motion is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., would also grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medina App. No. 09CA0022-M, 2010-Ohio-4282. Reported at 127 Ohio St.3d 1533, 2011-Ohio-376, 940 N.E.2d 986. On motion for reconsideration. The motion is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., would also grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

944 N.E.2d 697, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morris-ohio-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack