State v. Morris

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Morris

944 N.E.2d 697, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1448

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 2010-1842·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Medina App. No. 09CA0022-M, 2010-Ohio-4282. Reported at 127 Ohio St.3d 1533, 2011-Ohio-376, 940 N.E.2d 986. On motion for reconsideration. The motion is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., would also grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medina App. No. 09CA0022-M, 2010-Ohio-4282. Reported at 127 Ohio St.3d 1533, 2011-Ohio-376, 940 N.E.2d 986. On motion for reconsideration. The motion is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., would also grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

State v. Morris, 944 N.E.2d 697, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1448 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

944 N.E.2d 697 (State v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related