State v. Morris
This text of 91 A. 998 (State v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
charging the jury:
Gentlemen of the jury:—Charles B. Morris, the accused, stands indicted before this court and is on trial before you under an act of the General Assembly, entitled “An act-for-the suppression of gaming,” passed as long ago as 1857 (11 Del. Laws, c. 454), so that it is old enough to be good. It is the province of the court when called upon, to interpret and construe the law, and it is your province.as members of the jury to take the law and to fit the facts into it and from that make up your verdict. This act provides:
“Section 1. That if any person or persons shall keep or exhibit a gaming table, faro bank,_ sweat cloth, roulet table, or other device under any denomination, at which cards, dice or any other game of chance is played [229]*229for money, or other thing of value, or shall be a partner or concerned in interest in the keeping or exhibiting such table, bank, sweat cloth, or other device, he, she or they shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,” etc. Rev. Code, 961.
It is that law that the counsel in this case have asked us to construe.
In the second and fourth counts the accused is charged with keeping and exhibiting a gaming table in which he was concerned, or in which he had an interest. The court feel constrained to say that under the evidence adduced in this case in its opinion the charge made in the second and fourth counts of the indictment that the accused was concerned in interest in the keeping or exhibiting of a gaming table has not been sustained, and the charges made in those two counts are withdrawn from your consideration; so that the question left for your determination [230]*230is, whether or not the accused kept or exhibited a gaming table, as defined. You are to weigh, gentlemen of the jury, and consider the evidence as you have heard it from the stand. If the state has proven to your satisfaction that the accused kept or exhibited a gaming table, that it was under his control or management, then the offense charged has been sustained, and your verdict should be guilty, regardless of the fact that no profits were shown to have been proved as received by the accused from the table.
Verdict, guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A. 998, 28 Del. 226, 5 Boyce 226, 1914 Del. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morris-nygensess-1914.