State v. Morris
112 A. 893, 94 N.J.L. 567, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 239
Opinion
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—Swayze, Trenchabd, Bergen, Kaltscit, White, Hepbeniieimeb, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackbrson, JJ. 10.
For reversal—Parees, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Morris, 112 A. 893, 94 N.J.L. 567, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1920).
112 A. 893 (State v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Kobylarz
130 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Mazza v. Cavicchia
105 A.2d 545 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
State v. Kane
75 A.2d 894 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)