State v. Morris
This text of 50 Iowa 203 (State v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These sections evidently contemplate that an attachment shall issue, for the cause therein stated, only when demand has been made upon the debtor for payment or security, and he has refused to pay or secure the claim. The affidavit in this .case does not state that the defendant has refused to pay or secure the demand. In fact, it states -that no demand for payment or security has been made upon the defendant, for the reason that he so absents himself that no demand can be made. It is not even stated that the defendant absents himself to avoid a demand for payment or security.
It appears, from the affidavit of Worthington, that the-defendant is in Chicago. No reason is given why demand [206]*206for payment or security might not have been made upon him there. The statute has not authorized an attachment in case the defendant is absent from the State so that demand for payment or security cannot be made within the State; and were we to extend the statute to such a case by construction, our act would be nothing less than judicial legislation. If it is desirable that an attachment should issue in such a case the remedy must be provided by the Legislature.
III. Should we be of opinion that there was no error m sustaining the motion to quash, we are asked to send the cause back to the District Court, with instructions that the plaintiff have leave to amend the affidavit for attachment, as provided in section 3021 of the Code. This is a law action, reviewable here simply upon errors assigned. No leave to amend was asked in the court below, and hence that court made no ruling upon the right to amend. Having determined [207]*207that the court below committed no error of law, our duty is to affirm the case. The remaining causes assigned in the motion to discharge need not be considered.
Aeeirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 Iowa 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morris-iowa-1878.