State v. Morris
This text of 753 So. 2d 1277 (State v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review Morris v. State, 708 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), in which the Second District Court of Appeal followed its prior decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), in holding that chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, is unconstitutional as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.1 Based on our decision in State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), in which we held unconstitutional chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as viola-tive of the single subject rule, we affirm the decision below and remand this cause for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect on February 6, 1996, which is when Morris committed the underlying offense for which he was sentenced as a violent career criminal.2 See Thompson, 750 So.2d at 644 (remanding for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time the defendant committed her offenses).
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
753 So. 2d 1277, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 184, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 490, 2000 WL 232297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morris-fla-2000.