State v. Morris Canal & Banking Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Morris Canal & Banking Co.

12 N.J.L. 366

DecidedSeptember 15, 1831

StatusPublished

This text of 12 N.J.L. 366 (State v. Morris Canal & Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Morris Canal & Banking Co., 12 N.J.L. 366 (N.J. 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A notice is not necessary. We are of opinion, however, that the court may, in their discretion, grant a certiorari in the first instance, upon motion, ór if from the peculiar circumstances of the case, they should consider it necessary, direct a rule to shew cause. This is a novel case, of great importance, many questions may arise as to the most correct course of proceeding, the court therefore think it proper to direct a rule to shew cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A notice is not necessary. We are of opinion, however, that the court may, in their discretion, grant a certiorari in the first instance, upon motion, ór if from the peculiar circumstances of the case, they should consider it necessary, direct a rule to shew cause. This is a novel case, of great importance, many questions may arise as to the most correct course of proceeding, the court therefore think it proper to direct a rule to shew cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 N.J.L. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morris-canal-banking-co-nj-1831.