State v. Morosin

192 N.W.2d 165, 187 Neb. 521, 1971 Neb. LEXIS 664
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 1971·No. 38042·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

An information charged that defendant knowingly had concealed a stolen motorcycle with the intent to defraud the owner. Upon a plea of guilty the district court sentenced him to imprisonment for 2 to 3 years. On appeal defendant complains that the sentence was excessive. The governing statute, section 28-522, R. R. S. 1943, prescribed imprisonment for not less than 1 year nor more than 10 years.

We may reduce a sentence when in our opinion it is excessive, and we are under a duty to render such sentence as the evidence may warrant. See § 29-2308, R. R. S. 1943. Unless an abuse of discretion appears, we will not disturb a sentence within statutory limits. See State v. Escamilla, ante p. 457, 191 N. W. 2d 548 (1971).

*522 The record persuades us not to reduce the sentence. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Morosin, 192 N.W.2d 165, 187 Neb. 521, 1971 Neb. LEXIS 664 (Neb. 1971).

192 N.W.2d 165 (State v. Morosin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Weidenfeller
203 N.W.2d 784 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1973)
State v. Black Bear
193 N.W.2d 563 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1972)