State v. Morgan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Morgan

527 S.W.3d 187, 2017 WL 3707477

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 29, 2017

DocketNo. ED 105023

StatusPublished

This text of 527 S.W.3d 187 (State v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Morgan, 527 S.W.3d 187, 2017 WL 3707477 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Shawn Morgan appeals the circuit court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of voluntary manslaughter for the shooting death of Kelvin Dawson. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Shawn Morgan appeals the circuit court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of voluntary manslaughter for the shooting death of Kelvin Dawson. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 S.W.3d 187, 2017 WL 3707477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morgan-moctapp-2017.