State v. Morgan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Morgan

654 S.W.2d 326, 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 4064

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 24, 1983·No. No. 12752·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PREWITT, Judge.

Appellant attempts to appeal from an order revoking his probation and imposing a sentence of five years’ imprisonment for felony possession of marijuana. In his brief he attacks alleged errors in the probation revocation proceedings.

There is no appeal from a revocation of probation except perhaps when the suffi[327] ciency of the information or the jurisdiction of the trial court is challenged. Boyer v. State, 646 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.1983). See also State v. Murphy, 626 S.W.2d 649 (Mo.App.1981). Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the information or the jurisdiction of the trial court.

The appeal is dismissed.

MAUS, P.J., and HOGAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PREWITT, Judge.

Appellant attempts to appeal from an order revoking his probation and imposing a sentence of five years’ imprisonment for felony possession of marijuana. In his brief he attacks alleged errors in the probation revocation proceedings.

There is no appeal from a revocation of probation except perhaps when the suffi[327] ciency of the information or the jurisdiction of the trial court is challenged. Boyer v. State, 646 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.1983). See also State v. Murphy, 626 S.W.2d 649 (Mo.App.1981). Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the information or the jurisdiction of the trial court.

The appeal is dismissed.

MAUS, P.J., and HOGAN, J., concur.

State v. Morgan, 654 S.W.2d 326, 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 4064 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

654 S.W.2d 326 (State v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related