State v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Morgan

89 S.W. 1134, 191 Mo. 191, 1905 Mo. LEXIS 202

DecidedNovember 21, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.W. 1134 (State v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Morgan, 89 S.W. 1134, 191 Mo. 191, 1905 Mo. LEXIS 202 (Mo. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

FOX, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, in the Buchanan County Criminal Court, of rohhery in the first degree. There is no bill of exceptions preserving the action of the court during the progress of the trial; hence, we can only review the record proper.

We find the information in this cause in due form, charging the defendant with the offense of robbery in such terms as have repeatedly met the approval of this court. The record discloses the formal arraignment of the defendant and a plea of not guilty entered; trial by a jury impaneled regularly in accordance with the provisions of the statute, and a verdict returned finding the defendant guilty of the offense as charged, and assessing his punishment at ten years in the penitentiary.

A careful examination of the record discloses no error; therefore, the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOX, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, in the Buchanan County Criminal Court, of rohhery in the first degree. There is no bill of exceptions preserving the action of the court during the progress of the trial; hence, we can only review the record proper.

We find the information in this cause in due form, charging the defendant with the offense of robbery in such terms as have repeatedly met the approval of this court. The record discloses the formal arraignment of the defendant and a plea of not guilty entered; trial by a jury impaneled regularly in accordance with the provisions of the statute, and a verdict returned finding the defendant guilty of the offense as charged, and assessing his punishment at ten years in the penitentiary.

A careful examination of the record discloses no error; therefore, the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.W. 1134, 191 Mo. 191, 1905 Mo. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morgan-mo-1905.