Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Morgan

State v. Morgan

930 So. 2d 820, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, 2006 WL 1473591
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-2714
StatusPublished

This text of 930 So. 2d 820 (State v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Morgan, 930 So. 2d 820, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, 2006 WL 1473591 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order granting the motion to suppress statements made by ap-pellee, Ross Morgan. In granting the motion, the trial court relied upon our panel opinion in Canete v. State, 30 Fla. L. Weekly D1387 (Fla. 4th DCA June 30, 2005). After the trial court’s ruling, this court considered Cañete en banc, and issued an opinion contrary to the original panel decision. See Canete v. State, 921 So.2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (en banc).

Here, the Miranda warnings given to Morgan were almost identical to the warnings held to be sufficient in Cañete. Therefore, we reverse the order granting the motion to suppress and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canete v. State
921 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
930 So. 2d 820, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8575, 2006 WL 1473591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morgan-fladistctapp-2006.