State v. Moreno

558 So. 2d 470, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1494, 1990 WL 26682
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1990·No. No. 89-2728·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state petitions for writ of common law certiorari to review an order of the Appellate Division, Circuit Court, of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, affirming an order of the county court which granted a motion to suppress.

A Hialeah police officer was the only witness who testified before the county judge and plainly detailed the defendant’s alleged violation of sections 316.193 and 316.1925, Florida Statutes (1987). The officer’s testimony was unrebutted, uncontra-dicted, and unimpeached. The contraband that was seized flowed as an incident to the defendant’s arrest. Consequently, the county court impermissibly granted the defendant’s motion to suppress and the Circuit Court Appellate Division committed plain error in affirming that ruling. See State v. Fernandez, 526 So.2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA), cause dismissed, 531 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1988), and cases cited therein.

For the foregoing reasons, certiorari is granted and the decision of the Circuit Court Appellate Division affirming the erroneous suppression order is quashed with directions to reinstate.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moreno, 558 So. 2d 470, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1494, 1990 WL 26682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 470 (State v. Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Casey
821 So. 2d 1187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Fletcher v. Metro Dade Police Dept. Law Enforcement Trust Fund
593 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Hlad v. State
565 So. 2d 762 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Tenneboe v. Tenneboe
558 So. 2d 470 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)