State v. Moran
This text of 2013 ND 165 (State v. Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 9/25/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 165
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Frankie Manuel Moran, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20130061
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Christine H. McAllister, Burleigh County Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Kent M. Morrow, 411 N. 4th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant; on brief.
State v. Moran
[¶1] Frankie Moran appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of marijuana paraphernalia and not guilty of possession of alprazolam without a prescription. On appeal, Moran argues the verdicts are legally inconsistent and insufficient evidence exists to support the guilty verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moran-nd-2013.