State v. Morales

21 Tex. 298
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Wheeleb, J.

It is only by force of positive law, (P. C., Art. 774, 775,) that the Courts of this State can take cogni[300] zance of an offence committed against the laws of another State or country. It is the offence of bringing property into this State which was obtained by the commission of a crime, against the law of the foreign State, which our law punishes. To make out the offence, it must appear that the act complained of was criminal in the State, where it was committed. (Id. 775.) The law of the foreign State becomes a necessary element in proving the guilt of the accused ; and it ought, therefore, to be averred. The indictment should have averred that the stealing, taking, and carrying away, was, by the law of said State of Tamaulipas, criminal, and that it was theft. The Court did not err in adjudging the indictment insufficient for the want of the averment, and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Morales, 21 Tex. 298 (Tex. 1858).

21 Tex. 298 (State v. Morales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomasson v. State
269 S.W.2d 956 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Shankle v. State
91 S.W.2d 1072 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Knight v. State
31 S.W.2d 1082 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Moore v. Lewis
10 Pa. D. & C. 466 (Bradford County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Elliott v. State
255 S.W. 183 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Bink v. State
98 S.W. 249 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1906)
Edwards v. State
16 S.W. 98 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1891)
Cowell v. State
16 Tex. Ct. App. 57 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1884)
Carmisales v. State
11 Tex. Ct. App. 474 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1882)
Cummins v. State
12 Tex. Ct. App. 121 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1882)