State v. Morales-Hernandez

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Morales-Hernandez

527 S.W.3d 882

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 12, 2017

DocketWD 78502

StatusPublished

This text of 527 S.W.3d 882 (State v. Morales-Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Morales-Hernandez, 527 S.W.3d 882 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Luis Morales-Hernandez was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Clay County. Morales appeals, arguing that the circuit court abused its discretion by improperly admitting testimony concerning threats Morales made to another person two weeks before the murder. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Luis Morales-Hernandez was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Clay County. Morales appeals, arguing that the circuit court abused its discretion by improperly admitting testimony concerning threats Morales made to another person two weeks before the murder. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 S.W.3d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morales-hernandez-moctapp-2017.