State v. Morales

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Morales

815 So. 2d 635, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 322, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 634, 2002 WL 534467

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 2002

DocketNo. SC00-17

StatusPublished

This text of 815 So. 2d 635 (State v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Morales, 815 So. 2d 635, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 322, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 634, 2002 WL 534467 (Fla. 2002).

Pincite

Opinions

QUINCE, J.

We have for review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State v. Morales, 751 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), which cited to the court’s earlier opinion in State v. Huggins, 744 So.2d 1215 [636]*636(Fla. 4th DCA 1999), approved, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla.2001), and certified conflict with the decision in State v. White, 786 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The State raises one issue, i.e., that the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act (PRRP) applies to the crime of burglary of an unoccupied dwelling. We disagree and approve the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Morales for the reasons set forth in State v. Huggins, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla.2001).

It is so ordered.

SHAW, HARDING, and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which WELLS, C.J., concurs. PARIENTE, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI