State v. Morales
640 A.2d 116, 228 Conn. 928, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 80
This text of 640 A.2d 116 (State v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Morales, 640 A.2d 116, 228 Conn. 928, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 80 (Colo. 1994).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 184 (AC 11565), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the proper test for ruling on the defendant’s motion to dismiss, under article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution, was the test articulated in Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988)?
“2. If the answer to question (1) is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude, under the circumstances of this case, that: (a) a motion to dismiss was a proper remedy for the alleged failure of the state to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence; and (b) a different standard would apply to a motion to suppress evidence based on the same conduct of the state?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Morales
667 A.2d 68 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1995)
State v. Morales
657 A.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
640 A.2d 116, 228 Conn. 928, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morales-conn-1994.