State v. Moorehead

232 S.W.3d 721, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2007 WL 2702194
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2007·No. ED 88721·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rufus Moorehead (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree with a person less than twelve years old in violation of section 566.062 RSMo 2000. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior offender to two concurrent sentences of twenty years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moorehead, 232 S.W.3d 721, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2007 WL 2702194 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

232 S.W.3d 721 (State v. Moorehead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ecker v. State
232 S.W.3d 721 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)