State v. Moore

864 N.E.2d 629, 113 Ohio St. 3d 254
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 2, 2007
DocketNo. 2005-0266
StatusPublished

This text of 864 N.E.2d 629 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Moore, 864 N.E.2d 629, 113 Ohio St. 3d 254 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470; State v. Mathis, 109 Ohio St.3d 54, 2006-Ohio-855, 846 N.E.2d 1; State v. Saxon, 109 Ohio St.3d 176, 2006-Ohio-1245, 846 N.E.2d 824; and State v. Evans, 113 Ohio St.3d 100, 2007-Ohio-861, 863 N.E.2d 113.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Evans, 113 Ohio St.3d 100, 2007-Ohio-861, 863 N.E.2d 113.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Foster
845 N.E.2d 470 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
State v. Mathis
846 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
State v. Saxon
109 Ohio St. 3d 176 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
State v. Evans
113 Ohio St. 3d 100 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 N.E.2d 629, 113 Ohio St. 3d 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moore-ohio-2007.