State v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Moore

864 N.E.2d 629, 113 Ohio St. 3d 254

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 2, 2007·No. No. 2005-0266·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470; State v. Mathis, 109 Ohio St.3d 54, 2006-Ohio-855, 846 N.E.2d 1; State v. Saxon, 109 Ohio St.3d 176, 2006-Ohio-1245, 846 N.E.2d 824; and State v. Evans, 113 Ohio St.3d 100, 2007-Ohio-861, 863 N.E.2d 113.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Evans, 113 Ohio St.3d 100, 2007-Ohio-861, 863 N.E.2d 113.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470; State v. Mathis, 109 Ohio St.3d 54, 2006-Ohio-855, 846 N.E.2d 1; State v. Saxon, 109 Ohio St.3d 176, 2006-Ohio-1245, 846 N.E.2d 824; and State v. Evans, 113 Ohio St.3d 100, 2007-Ohio-861, 863 N.E.2d 113.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Evans, 113 Ohio St.3d 100, 2007-Ohio-861, 863 N.E.2d 113.

State v. Moore, 864 N.E.2d 629, 113 Ohio St. 3d 254 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

864 N.E.2d 629 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related