State v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Moore

721 N.E.2d 122, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3887

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 22, 1999

Docket99-1960

StatusPublished

This text of 721 N.E.2d 122 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moore, 721 N.E.2d 122, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3887 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Fairfield App. No. 99CA24. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed October 25,1999, at page 2:

“Is the odor of burnt-marijuana, alone, sufficient to provide probable cause to search a defendant’s motor vehicle?”

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 99-1855, State v. Moore, Fairfield App. No. 99CA24.

The conflict cases are State v. Younts (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 708, 637 N.E.2d 64; and State v. Haynes (July 19, 1996), Portage App. No. 95-P-0007, unreported, 1996 WL 649167.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI