State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Moore

174 S.E.2d 695, 8 N.C. App. 603, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1632

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJune 24, 1970

DocketNo. 7018SC288

StatusPublished

This text of 174 S.E.2d 695 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moore, 174 S.E.2d 695, 8 N.C. App. 603, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1632 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

MoeRIS, J.

The record contains no assignments of error. Defendant’s counsel states in his brief that since he knows of no error committed by the court, no assignments of error were made. He further states in his brief that defendant has been asked if he wished to supplement the brief with arguments of his own, but the defendant has declined to do so. However, defendant has filed in this Court several documents, including a copy of the record on appeal filed by his counsel, which he refers to as “entirety of all records and contentions enclosed herein.” By his letter to the Clerk, he asks that they be filed and directed for full review. This we have assumed is defendant’s own supplemental brief. We have ordered that it be added to the record filed without printing.

We have carefully examined the record and the documents sub[604]*604mitted by defendant and are in accord with counsel’s conclusion that in the trial of this matter- there was

No error.

MallaRD, C.J., and Gbaham, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MoeRIS, J.

The record contains no assignments of error. Defendant’s counsel states in his brief that since he knows of no error committed by the court, no assignments of error were made. He further states in his brief that defendant has been asked if he wished to supplement the brief with arguments of his own, but the defendant has declined to do so. However, defendant has filed in this Court several documents, including a copy of the record on appeal filed by his counsel, which he refers to as “entirety of all records and contentions enclosed herein.” By his letter to the Clerk, he asks that they be filed and directed for full review. This we have assumed is defendant’s own supplemental brief. We have ordered that it be added to the record filed without printing.

We have carefully examined the record and the documents sub[604]*604mitted by defendant and are in accord with counsel’s conclusion that in the trial of this matter- there was

No error.

MallaRD, C.J., and Gbaham, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 S.E.2d 695, 8 N.C. App. 603, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moore-ncctapp-1970.