State v. . Moore

163 S.E. 700, 202 N.C. 841, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 266
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 13, 1932·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

At the August Term, 1931, of the Superior Court of Davidson County the prisoner was convicted of murder in the first degree and was sentenced to' death by electrocution. On appeal to the Supreme Court the judgment was affirmed. S. v. Moore, 201 N. C., 618. At the next ensuing term of the Superior Court held for the trial of criminal actions the prisoner made a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. After considering the affidavits *842 offered by the prisoner and the argument of counsel, the trial judge in the exercise of his discretion denied the motion. The prisoner excepted and appealed.

The question whether a new trial shall be granted for newly discovered evidence is addressed to the discretion of the court. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808; S. v. Cox, ante, 378; S. v. Griffin, ante, 517. The exercise of such discretion .is not subject to review on appeal to this Court. S. v. Branner, 149 N. C., 559; S. v. Griffin, supra. This principle is settled and will be strictly .enforced. The appeal is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Moore, 163 S.E. 700, 202 N.C. 841, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 266 (N.C. 1932).

163 S.E. 700 (State v. . Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lee
205 S.E.2d 360 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
In Re Renfrow
100 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
State v. . Ferrell
175 S.E. 91 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Edwards
172 S.E. 399 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Lea
166 S.E. 292 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
State v. Davis
203 N.C. 316 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)