State v. Moore

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Moore

458 S.W.3d 481, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 292, 2015 WL 1262838

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101431

StatusPublished

This text of 458 S.W.3d 481 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moore, 458 S.W.3d 481, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 292, 2015 WL 1262838 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Andrew Moore (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of unlawful possession of a firearm and unlawful use of a firearm. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal in that there was insufficient evidence presented to find him guilty of each offense beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Andrew Moore (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of unlawful possession of a firearm and unlawful use of a firearm. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal in that there was insufficient evidence presented to find him guilty of each offense beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 S.W.3d 481, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 292, 2015 WL 1262838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moore-moctapp-2015.