State v. Moore

92 S.W.3d 103, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1829, 2002 WL 2003711
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1697
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 3, 2002·No. No. ED 79674·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Wayne Moore, Sr. (Appellant) appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury trial for felony stealing, in violation of Section 570.030,1 and tampering with physical evidence, in violation of Section 575.100, for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive sentences of three years’ and five years’ imprisonment, respectively. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Dulany, 781 S.W.2d 52, 55 (Mo. banc 1989). We also find that the trial court did not err in matters involving the admission of evidence, nor was Appellant so prejudiced that he was deprived of a fair trial. State v. Richardson, 923 S.W.2d 301, 311 (Mo.banc 1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moore, 92 S.W.3d 103, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1829, 2002 WL 2003711 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

92 S.W.3d 103 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Richardson
923 S.W.2d 301 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1996)
State v. Dulany
781 S.W.2d 52 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)