State v. Moore

957 S.W.2d 448, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1974, 1997 WL 713287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 1997·No. No. WD 52809·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Susan M. Moore appeals from her conviction of distribution of a controlled substance [449]*449near a school, section 195.214, RSMo 1994, and possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 1994. Ms. Moore was sentenced as a prior offender, section 558.016, RSMo 1994, to concurrent terms of fifteen and seven years imprisonment, respectively. She claims four points of error allegedly made during trial: (1) the trial court failed to exclude sua sponte an alleged hearsay statement; (2) her defense counsel questioned her about alleged privileged communications in court; (3) the trial court did not exclude sua sponte police testimony about known drug users visiting Ms. Moore at the scene of her arrest; and (4) the verdict finding instruction was erroneous.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moore, 957 S.W.2d 448, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1974, 1997 WL 713287 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

957 S.W.2d 448 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.