State v. Moore

719 So. 2d 59, 1998 La. LEXIS 1714, 1998 WL 326945
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1998·No. No. 98-KP-0262·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; [60]*60Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 12750-94; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW97-1393.

Writ granted; revocation of probation reinstated. Because the state presented more than adequate factual support showing that Moore violated a term of his probation by-violating a law, La.C.Cr.P. art. 895(A); R.S. 15:542, and because Moore knew of the law, cf. State v. Sussmann, 374 So.2d 1256, 1259 (La.1979), no abuse of the district court’s discretion appears. La.C.Cr.P. art. 900; Sussmann, 374 So.2d at 1259; State v. Lassai, 366 So.2d 1389, 1391 (La.1978); State ex rel. Robertson v. Maggio, 341 So.2d 366, 370 (La.1976).

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moore, 719 So. 2d 59, 1998 La. LEXIS 1714, 1998 WL 326945 (La. 1998).

719 So. 2d 59 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moore
847 So. 2d 53 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)