State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Moore

719 So. 2d 59, 1998 La. LEXIS 1714, 1998 WL 326945

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 15, 1998

DocketNo. 98-KP-0262

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 So. 2d 59 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moore, 719 So. 2d 59, 1998 La. LEXIS 1714, 1998 WL 326945 (La. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; [60]*60Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 12750-94; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW97-1393.

Writ granted; revocation of probation reinstated. Because the state presented more than adequate factual support showing that Moore violated a term of his probation by-violating a law, La.C.Cr.P. art. 895(A); R.S. 15:542, and because Moore knew of the law, cf. State v. Sussmann, 374 So.2d 1256, 1259 (La.1979), no abuse of the district court’s discretion appears. La.C.Cr.P. art. 900; Sussmann, 374 So.2d at 1259; State v. Lassai, 366 So.2d 1389, 1391 (La.1978); State ex rel. Robertson v. Maggio, 341 So.2d 366, 370 (La.1976).

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re State of Louisiana;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; [60]*60Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 12750-94; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW97-1393.

Writ granted; revocation of probation reinstated. Because the state presented more than adequate factual support showing that Moore violated a term of his probation by-violating a law, La.C.Cr.P. art. 895(A); R.S. 15:542, and because Moore knew of the law, cf. State v. Sussmann, 374 So.2d 1256, 1259 (La.1979), no abuse of the district court’s discretion appears. La.C.Cr.P. art. 900; Sussmann, 374 So.2d at 1259; State v. Lassai, 366 So.2d 1389, 1391 (La.1978); State ex rel. Robertson v. Maggio, 341 So.2d 366, 370 (La.1976).

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 So. 2d 59, 1998 La. LEXIS 1714, 1998 WL 326945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moore-la-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack