State v. Moore

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Moore

253 P. 1116, 43 Idaho 579, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 203

DecidedFebruary 15, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 253 P. 1116 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moore, 253 P. 1116, 43 Idaho 579, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 203 (Idaho 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

BUDGE, J.

Respondent was charged by information with a violation of what is commonly known as the blue sky law, under the provisions of C. S., chap. 206. The cause came on for trial, and after the state rested its case counsel for respondent moved the court that an instruction be given to the jury advising it to acquit respondent, upon the ground that, conceding all the evidence introduced by the state to be true, it was insufficient to sustain the allegations of the information or to show the commission of any criminal offense. The court so advised the jury, whereupon a verdict of acquittal was returned. From *580 the judgment entered on the verdict so rendered the state has appealed.

There are no assignments of error specified in appellant’s brief. We have, however, examined the entire record, and .find no reversible error. The judgment is affirmed.

Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Givens, Taylor and T. Bailey Lee, Jj., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUDGE, J.

Respondent was charged by information with a violation of what is commonly known as the blue sky law, under the provisions of C. S., chap. 206. The cause came on for trial, and after the state rested its case counsel for respondent moved the court that an instruction be given to the jury advising it to acquit respondent, upon the ground that, conceding all the evidence introduced by the state to be true, it was insufficient to sustain the allegations of the information or to show the commission of any criminal offense. The court so advised the jury, whereupon a verdict of acquittal was returned. From *580 the judgment entered on the verdict so rendered the state has appealed.

There are no assignments of error specified in appellant’s brief. We have, however, examined the entire record, and .find no reversible error. The judgment is affirmed.

Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Givens, Taylor and T. Bailey Lee, Jj., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 P. 1116, 43 Idaho 579, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moore-idaho-1927.