State v. Moore

153 A.3d 1289, 324 Conn. 915, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 35
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 25, 2017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*1290The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 169 Conn.App. 470, 151 A.3d 412 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"In concluding that the defendant could not prevail on his motion to strike the voir dire panel on the ground that it failed to constitute a fair cross-section of the community:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that census data pertaining to the entire African-American population in Connecticut and New London county was not probative evidence with respect to the claimed underrepresentation of African-American males in the jury pool?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly decline, in light of the provisions of General Statutes § 51-232 (c), to exercise its supervisory authority over the administration of justice to enforce the collection of demographic data to permit analysis of the diversity of jury panels in Connecticut?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moore, 153 A.3d 1289, 324 Conn. 915, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 35 (Colo. 2017).

153 A.3d 1289 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Chester J.
204 Conn. App. 137 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2021)
State v. Moore
334 Conn. 275 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019)