State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Moore

934 A.2d 243, 284 Conn. 927, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 445

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 16, 2007·No. SC 17992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 1 (AC 26736), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to strike the state’s redirect examination of a witness, and, if so, was the impropriety harmless error?”

*928 Decided October 16, 2007 Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 1 (AC 26736), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to strike the state’s redirect examination of a witness, and, if so, was the impropriety harmless error?”

*928 Decided October 16, 2007 Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in opposition.

State v. Moore, 934 A.2d 243, 284 Conn. 927, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 445 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

934 A.2d 243 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related